The equality of words and inequality have been released so often that they bring an instinctive reaction disgusting. People just do not want to hear about it, even when they recognize the various abuses and corporate influence on government policy. All that is endlessly regurgitated for decades, their opinions with passion and presented by inadequate messengers can be ridiculously awkward and inspire an instinctive gesture. This includes the aggressive talk by the rich religious moralizing preachers adulteress, the agenda of the factions at the low level of education silly demagogues like Al Sharpton, or calls for equality of income by college-educated white children of the bourgeoisie. Every time he opens his mouth we want to turn away because we understand the background of hypocricies, corruption, the following temporary fashion behavior, lack of education, superstition, and blatant factional interests. Decades of passionate excitement and counter-babble has trained us to ignore as an annoying noise similar to one found in crowded subway platforms.It does not help that Americans have to live in a hyper great ideological power that has no an ideology powerful competitor. Cold War competition, at least allowed an extreme point of view presented to the world and drew attention to the problems of course obvious, such as race relations. However, the world faces a "fair and balanced presentation." That are not superpowers had to endure decades of a situation similar to a news program talking with two guests modern talking about the other (or Jerry Springer). The talking head equivalents from Moscow and Washington DC, is poured into each other endless streams of real data are mixed with propaganda. Made positive progress and weaknesses internal enemies were made, of course, exaggerated. Besides the hype, all that is seen through a lens and increasingly sharp ideological distortion. Above all these lies, the intelligence agencies of both countries fought endless information / propaganda war aimed at the entire globe. After decades of brainwashing full orchestra, a society finally collapsed and began to deal with reality. After bottoming out, the Russians finally began to try at least be objective when it comes to actual statistics, numbers, scientific findings and facts on the ground. Basing national policy on faith-based notions of Soviet dream and way of life proved to be destructive. Russian society, however, readily accept American capitalism (to a degree higher than the Germans or the Japanese) because it was easy to replace a rigid ideological construct to another. Let's see American Gangster finance lives in Europe long after the United here.United decreases not undergo a similar transformation, as it did not have to. The Soviet tired talking head that Americans were screaming, it was finally blue in the face and had a heart attack. This was taken as a complete statement of years of U.S. propaganda at least as effective if not entirely factual. Major players in the world (India, Japan, Brazil, Turkey, Poland) stood up and clapped like Jerry Springer satisfied customers to get pats on the back for a good turnout. A step further from the central command structures economic and dismissed concerns previously presented by the Socialist theorists.Obviously it is impossible to separate the ideology of empirical evidence. Although objectivity and scientific agreements are only forms of consensual intersubjectivity. However, you can always try at least to approach a situation as a disinterested anthropologist. It is certainly possible that a rich white British person to study poverty in India and describe with relative accuracy, without being emotional "bleeding heart" or being accused of being in the pocket of the poor Indian lobby. American education can be studied income inequality in Brazil or Mexico and describe the political situation without being accused of siding with a particular ideological faction in either country. It is very likely to be relatively uninterested in describing observable reality in the sense of history, empirical prediction and research vessels to be used by policy person. Americans definitely study and report on other societies of this kind all the time and even make predictions.But what happens when they say, scholars in France and China to observe the U.S. domestic situation and concluded that the situation is negative and not is healthy? That's right, once is considered darned good socialist knows, no bleeding hearts and / or ideologues with their own agenda, anti-American. Even Americans are national descriptions of unpleasant realities are despised and rejected, even if the Ivy League respected authorities on the subject (and often despised by that). This is analogous to a person with a drinking problem accusing everyone who mentions that they have an agenda, they have to have a drink, so I know nothing, and not living in the house of the person or he wants the alcoholic fail.How come to this? Well, Americans suffer from the Soviets the same problem in 1970, when it comes to living in a social bubble, rigidly ideological. Americans become so accustomed to their own authorities boldly with faith-based ideological slogans, distort the facts, and being ridiculously one-sided, he began thinking about all world authorities to do the same. The way a thief thinks that all other thefts, rigid ideologues are unable to see opposing views, without thinking that ideology is not. This is best seen in fundamentalist religious communities. The clergy had told the faithful that their lifestyle is moral for so long that every time the herd was found with people who live / think differently, to consider the different lifestyles as immoral and supported by a sinister agenda.It is time to begin to differentiate between the blatant agenda pushing messengers (eg, features Jesse Jackson and Dick Cheney) and softer subconscious agenda of people trying to be journalists and scientists. Today, there are about 20% of Russians who voted for the Communist Party and the march in the streets and talk about how good he was in the slow decay of the 1980. Ideological inertia similar will happen with older people of America in the future after the current system is transformed to survive in the modern world. One can laugh at the idea of American propaganda (the capitalist American dream) is the most widely imposed in the Soviet Union as authoritarian. However, before the American version of glasnost was available with the Internet, serious opposing views were heard even less by the general public. You never heard national news stations radio and television shows to discuss seriously the welfare of Scandinavian style, with more money in the construction industry and real jobs instead of more aircraft carriers to outspend Moscow, or the creation of a better quality of life than Germans.We remember that serious discussion (in improving the quality of American life in the socioeconomic status of the solidification of an average American or the creation of labor to industrial Japanese) did not materialize, even after the Soviet Union collapsed. Instead, the only argument that briefly bubbled into question the next plan of action for the American military.It that took a few paragraphs to prepare the reader for the discussion of economic inequality in the United States. Why is the discussion of inequality even necessary? It is obvious that inequality between men occurs naturally in any system. The hybrid style Western capitalism as we know it is here to stay for years in the future in one form or another. Inequality in United States, however, ceased to be sustainable for some time and now is the root cause of the United States in decline in the 21st century in relation to the emerging powers of China and the EU. The decrease at this point, it is unstoppable and the only dispute is whether it will be a slow and gradual (similar to Spain in the 19th century), or a fast potential social instability.Yes also the crushing financial burden of being a power of ideological expansion and transfer of heavy industry competitors such as China. These charges pale in comparison to the root cause of the monstrous inequality which allowed most of the deeper structural problems and the superficial symptoms to occur. We've heard people throw around steep unresearched statements on how the top 1% owns half the wealth and the like. At the same time, we also heard counter claims that the wealthiest pay most taxes. When such statements are released on the discussion becomes another episode of Jerry Springer is of.There off barking at actual historical data collected continuously, displayed, and ignored by highly qualified people. Let some.In April last year, a spokesman of the oldest propaganda and reading The Wall Street Journal, decided it was a good idea to throw a few bones of his readers. Readers, of course, are the people who consider themselves financially independent "middle class" and not just the equivalent of child delivery of the oligarchs with political connections. Readers tend to include new assimilated ethnic groups like the Irish and the Italians trying to catch up and work overtime to get their 60-150 thousand dollars a year. The oligarchs themselves never again to Wall Street Journal for their news and opinions. Summer 2007 to summer of 2008 saw historic increases in gas prices and saw people like Lou Dobbs throw fits every day about illegal immigration. Occasional articles began appearing in the media of national circulation to address growing concerns about "middle class" problems. Some of these items deepening began including survey studies about structural weaknesses and social civilization.The American source of the example above, the article comes from a very interesting study by Emmanuel Saez Berkley, John Bates Clark medal Prize winner in 2009 (Milton Friedman and Paul Krugman, among previous winners), and the possible influence on the thinking of Obama's tax. The data in Excel format is here: (elsa.berkeley.edu or ~ saez/TabFig2006.xls). We see a graph showing ridiculous that some things not easily noticed due to interruption of the percentile of the study 10% of employees. The data show annual wealth creation both including and excluding capital gains as stocks.First, to analyze the top 1% of employees without looking at the receiving additional wealth through capital investment. The actual reported income (adjusted for inflation) of the richest 0.01% of the population (14,000 families oligarchs who make an average of $ 16.5 million a year with at least $ 6.5 million in annual revenue to be part the group), grew 22% between 2000 and 2006. Average real incomes of the richest 0.1% of households (133,000 households oligarchs by an average of $ 3 million annually and the need to make $ 1.4 million to $ 6.5 million a year to join the group), grew by 8.5%. To be included in the richest 1%, a house had to spend only the $ 376,000 threshold of miserable dollars a year. There were 1,333,249 households that make up most of the 1%, were above 99% of American workers, but paled in comparison with 0.1% of the population. Many were professional elites and not necessarily those financial wizards and changers.This money means that 10% to 10% of 1% of richest households (1 in 10,000 households), were able to nearly triple its annual profits compared with 1,500,000 households are also the richest 1%. This is with capital gains EXCLUDED of earnings estimates. It is significant that the elite class of professional and management amount to over one million (represented by the nationalist faction of democratic capitalism) was not able to spend more than 150,000 homes less politically oligarchs in the last election. The attractiveness of financial capitalism allowed many millionaires under democratic nationalists to co-opted.We can see how capital gains begin to matter exponentially once you start getting into 5% of the population. Capital gains are only added $ 95 million in wealth for 90% of the population (divided among more than 130 million households), but adds $ 678 million to 10% richer. Proceeds from the oligarch class non-professional elite, the + 0.1% increased by 60%. Capital gains income only increased the bottom 90% in only 2.3%. Republican leadership effectively convinced a large part of 50-100 thousand dollars a year white-collar population are working in their own interest and capital gains actually relieve them financially. It was remarkable that the same tactic that always uses the low level of religious education of blue-collar population also worked on the little white collar. Even the wealthy children, linked to speculation expensive housing bubble, got politically seduced enough to give financial support to the internationalist rich.In Super 2003, something historic happened. For the first time since 1928, 1% of the population exceeded 99% lower when it comes to the rate of generation of wealth. Wealth generation rate is a good indicator of the total power of a political faction split when limited resources nation.Recently successful, the government of Brazil has declared important in reducing poverty, citing that 10 % was to own 49.47% of annual national income in March 2002 to own 46.31% in October 2008. Obviously we do not know to what extent the stock market crash and the reduction of capital gains in the fall of 2008 played in that. The fact of the matter is that the leadership of Brazil, who heads one of the most economically unequal societies in the world, said increased participation of 10% lower and the decline in the share of 90% higher as a measure of progress. In America, however, 10% began to gain 49.3% of annual national income in 2006. The Gini index of inequality shows that U.S. has been more and more like Brazil in the last 30 years. U.S. Gap between the poorest and richest began around the same category as other Western nations (including Norway) in the 1960's and is now overcoming some South American nations in width.CONCLUSION: Political scientists consider the extreme levels of socioeconomic inequality to be socially destabilizing in terms of factional infighting, violence and authoritarian control of the governing bodies of the elite to enrich themselves. United States seems to have escaped the social instability because of its great power status and most of its population living in an ideological bubble (and most people do not travel outside the country). Only in relatively recent times, the top 30% of the population begins to be exposed to other hybrid systems by increasing international travel.The of American civilization seems to have occurred in the period 1968-1973. The data indicate 1973 as being the greatest measure of U.S. industrial capitalism and the actual physical influence for most of its population. This force that existed after being partially drained through funding for the richest colony occupation.The 1% increased their share of wealth much lower than the bottom 99%. The increase in prices briefly fell to the actual income. American workers were able to save and improve their condition, without constantly a few steps behind inflation or oligarchic factions. The country had historically high degree of economic equality, the burden of imports of natural resources only in its infant stages, and American workers were on top of their political power and purchasing. This allowed them to take enough to compete effectively with the factions oligarchs to influence the federal government. The federal government was due to participate in a series of nationalist measures that benefit all, rather than some.The health of American society led to a multitude of reversals of the socialist cause in the imperial periphery of Western Europe. The reactionary forces of Europe were able to stabilize their societies and that American workers demonstrated that American way of life is more effective than socialist. Many European States made in the great society JFK / Lyndon Johnson is committed to strengthening the rule capitalism.In the United States itself, the oligarchy took a number of years to reorganize and stage a comeback. The last president nationalist, who really tried to preserve the American way of life and appeal to all Americans, rather than some, it was Jimmy Carter. He tried to improve the efficiency of American capitalism through deregulation, improving the rights of workers, new energy policy, and the periphery actually leads by example imperial ideology. He had the misfortune of being in control of the nation immediately after its highest point of civilization. Oligarchs effectively destroyed Carter's reputation and created a reactionary wave which was based on previously apolitical religious rural population. Wedge issues, militarism, racial tensions and resentment against rural towns are exploited to make a puppet attractive (a former actor) in power. It took several years to dismantle previous nationalistic policies of Johnson and Carter. Once dismantled, the oligarchs began the rapid expansion of their income to the end of 1980 only accelerated to the present. In the first half of the 20th century, many oligarchs have their roots in American soil since air travel was dangerous propeller and the ships or trains took a long time. That led many oligarchs first to have nationalist tendencies, improve the value of nearby land, and focus on real industry. With increasing globalization, the oligarchs of the 1980s was now in the world as their playground and cosmopolitan feelings had little loyalty to the United States. The physical deterioration of the U.S. and debt are irreversible and mass looting began in the way of moving factories and personal material wealth abroad to other growing societies.The fall of the Soviet Union accelerated the process and allowed the looting to continue for longer . U.S. dollar could now be pushed hundreds of millions of new people and the national debt could be extended. The Bush administration was the program most brazen of force by the top 1% and this period saw the greatest illusion of oligarchic financial capitalism. In 2008, millions of professionals and the wealthy elite children were finally able to spend more and fight out of control of the oligarchs. They were not making money from both the speculation and energy prices made their business less profitable and more expensive lifestyles. Even then, the poorest of the top 5% were only able to take power because of the successful mobilization of black college and a sufficient number of financial capitalism in decline for several years, and the reversal of work in the Middle East. The strength of the oligarchic faction is demonstrated by the fact that their only candidate lost by less than 10% during the worst economic crisis since 1929.Regardless of change in leadership, millionaires lower now in charge, only their own interests. Interests of the bottom 90% only relevant if they are consistent with the national interests of the elites of democratic industrial power. Socioeconomic inequality created in the last 30 years has become self perpetuating, and can only be reduced through decades of effort from top to bottom along with the growing industrial economy of tangible export production. Efforts in this direction is unlikely until the U.S. economic bottoms for social unrest. Today 1% live in a country within a fragmented elite country.The America (John Edwards liked to talk until the defamation) is more advanced and more free than any other country in Western Europe and access to better healthcare / education, cheaper land / energy, and more political control over its management. U.S. is structurally a more advanced South American society. The average citizen thinks there is no progress due to modern expensive cars, clothing and shelter are mixed with the rest. The former leader of the ethnic Anglo has learned during the golden age not to the extent of his obvious material wealth. In that, they continued their assimilates new counterparts.The South American ethnic groups of Irish / Italian / Slavic / Jews are direct manifestations of their material possessions. The efforts of the consumerism of the new targets to adapt and catch up has infected all Americans. Poorer less educated people are encouraged to spend a monthly paycheck through a new gadget or designer clothes. This is no different than a Soviet worker spent 2 months worth of your salary to buy the western blue jeans a black market in the 1980s. The only difference between the black market the Soviet Union and the giant electronics stores in the United States today, is that the latter is legal. However, electronic stores and clothing are also dominated by products made in foreign factories and operated by the oligarchs exploiting cracks in the ability of U.S. industrial capitalism to meet the needs of the people. This system is even less sustainable than the Russian, combining the stagnant Soviet infrastructure in the 1980s with gangster capitalism of Yeltsin and economic inequalities of the 1990s. Only the rapid advances in industrial / technology can make the safe and gradual national decline.
SHANY 2012 Nail Art Polish Stamp Invicta 7146 Men’s Invicta Signature Grand Diver Automatic Watch